Comparison of Effect of Prone and Right Lateral Positions on Gastric Residual Volume in Preterm Newborns

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

2 Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

Abstract

Background: Nutritional problems in premature newborns are of great importance for their development. In this regard, the neonatal positioning during and after feeding can have a significant effect on their nutritional tolerance. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the effect of two positions (i.e., prone and right lateral) on gastric residual volume in preterm newborns after gavage feeding.
Methods: This crossover clinical trial was performed on 52 eligible premature newborns who were selected using purposive sampling. They were randomly assigned into two groups, namely A and B. After gavage feeding, the newborns in group A were placed in the prone position and their gastric residual volume was measured 3 times. Subsequently, after gavage feeding, they were put in the right lateral position and subjected to the same measurement. On the other hand, the newborns in group B were first put in the right lateral and then a prone position. The other procedures and measurements were performed the same as those in group A. The data were analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA.
Results: The results indicated a significant difference regarding the mean value of gastric residual volume (P=0.001). Moreover, the mean gastric residual volume in the prone position (2.152±0.299) was significantly (P=0.001) lower than that in the lateral position (2.618±0.403).
Conclusion: According to the results, The prone position can reduce the mean gastric residual. Therefore, it can be recommended as a suitable position after gavage feeding in premature newborns.

Keywords


1. Embleton ND, Fewtrell M. Complementary feeding in preterm infants. Lancet Glob Health. 2017; 5(5):e470-1.
 2. Moni SC, Mannan M, Dey SK, Dey AC, Saha D, Shahidullah M. Probiotic supplementation and its effect on weight and feed tolerance in preterm low birth weight newborns: a clinical trial. Bangladesh J Child Health. 2017; 39(2):82-7.
3. Pourazar F, Borimnejad L, Mohaghaghi P, Haghani H. Comparison of the effects of prone and supine positions on abdominal distention in the premature infants receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Iran J Neonatol. 2018; 9(1):7-12.
4. Howson CP, Kinney MV, McDougall L, Lawn JE; Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Born too soon: preterm birth matters. Reprod Health. 2013; 10(Suppl 1):S1.
 5. Quinn JA, Munoz FM, Gonik B, Frau L, Cutland C, Mallett-Moore T, et al. Preterm birth: definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2016; 34(49):6047-56.
6. Lawn JE, Davidge R, Paul VK, von Xylander S, de Graft Johnson J, Costello A, et al. Born too soon: care for the preterm baby. Reprod Health. 2013; 10(Suppl 1):S5.
 7. Been JV, Lugtenberg MJ, Smets E, van Schayck CP, Kramer BW, Mommers M, et al. Preterm birth and childhood wheezing disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(1): e1001596.
8. Koletzko B, Boey CC, Campoy C, Carlson SE, Chang N, Guillermo-Tuazon MA, et al. Current information and Asian perspectives on long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in pregnancy, lactation, and infancy: systematic review and practice recommendations from an early nutrition academy workshop. Ann Nutr Metab. 2014; 65(1):49-80.
9. Schneider N, Garcia‐Rodenas CL. Early nutritional interventions for brain and cognitive development in preterm infants: a review of the literature. Nutrients. 2017; 9(3):E187.
 10. Lapointe M, Barrington KJ, Savaria M, Janvier A. Preventing postnatal growth restriction in infants with birthweight less than 1300 g. Acta Paediatr. 2016; 105(2):e54-9.
11. Jadcherla SR, Khot T, Moore R, Malkar M, Gulati IK, Slaughter JL. Feeding methods at discharge predict long-term feeding and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants referred for gastrostomy evaluation. J Pediatr. 2017; 181:125-30.
12. Li YF, Lin HC, Torrazza RM, Parker L, Talaga E, Neu J. Gastric residual evaluation in preterm neonates: a useful monitoring technique or a hindrance? Pediatr Neonatol. 2014; 55(5):335-40.
13. Ballout RA, Foster JP, Kahale LA, Badr L. Body positioning for spontaneously breathing preterm infants with apnoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9(1):CD004951.
 14. Madlinger-Lewis L, Reynolds L, Zarem C, Crapnell T, Inder T, Pineda R. The effects of alternative positioning on preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. Res Dev Disabil. 2014; 35(2):490-7.
 15. Sangers H, De Jong P, Mulder SE, Stigter GD, Van Den Berg C, Te Pas AB, et al. Outcomes of gastric residuals whilst feeding preterm infants in various body positions. J Neonat Nurs. 2013; 19(6):337-41.
16. King C, Norton D. Does therapeutic positioning of preterm infants’ impact upon optimal health outcomes? A literature review. J Neonat Nurs. 2017; 23(5):218-22.
17. Chen SS, Tzeng YL, Gau BS, Kuo PC, Chen JY. Effects of prone and supine positioning on gastric residuals in preterm infants: a time series with cross-over study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013; 50(11): 1459-67.
 18. Valizadeh S, Hosseini MB, Asghari Jafarabadi M. Comparison of the effect of nutrition in kangaroo mother care and supine positions on gavage residual volume in preterm infants. Evid Based Care. 2015; 5(1):17-24.
19. Hussein HA. The difference between right side and semi recumbent positions after feeding on gastric residual volume among infants. J Am Sci. 2012; 8(1):127-32.
20. Jebreili M, Syeedrasooli A, Headarzadeh M, Gogezadeh M. The effect of body position on gastric residual in preterm infants. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2011; 33(2):13-8.
 21. Jarus T, Bart O, Rabinovich G, Sadeh A, Bloch L, Dolfin T, et al. Effects of prone and supine positions on sleep state and stress responses in preterm infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2011; 34(2):257-63.