Assessment of Plaque pH after Oral Rinsing with Four Customary Used Types of Complementary Infant Formula


1 Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran

3 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran


Background: Complementary infant formulas are the second most important sources of nutrition for neonates after breast milk. Considering the cariogenic potential of infant formulas, selection of these nutritive sources should be safe to reduce the risk of baby bottle syndrome in newborns. The present study aimed to estimate the plaque pH changes after rinsing with four customary used types of complementary infant formula.
Methods: An in-vivo, in-vitro study was conducted on five healthy neonates aged 12-18 months to assess the plaque pH changes caused by rinsing with four different types of complementary infant formula, including Rice and Milk Cerelac, Wheat and Milk Cerelac, Banana and Milk Humana, and Peach and Milk Humana. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 17 using paired t-test to compare the pH changes associated with each formula. In all the statistical analyses, P-value of less than 0.01 was considered significant.
Results: All the formulas significantly reduced the plaque pH to less than the pre-rinse pH. However, the plaque pH decreased to less than the critical pH level (<5.7), particularly in the infants using the Rice and Milk Cerelac formula.
Conclusion: According to the results, rinsing with the Rice and Milk Cerelac formula reduced the plaque pH value more than the other formulas. Therefore, it seems that complementary infant formulas could decrease the plaque pH and play a key role in the development of caries in neonates depending on the ingredients.


1. Agostoni C, Decsi T, Fewtrell M, Goulet O, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, et al. Complementary feeding: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008; 46(1):99-110.

2. Shafieian T, A Latiff L, Huang Soo Lee M, Mazidi M, Ghayour Mobarhan M, Tabatabaei G, et al. Determinants of nutritional status in children living in Mashhad, Iran. Int J Pediatr. 2013; 1(2):9-18.

3. Lung'aho MG, Glahn RP. In vitro estimates of iron bioavailability in some Kenyan complementary foods. Food Nutr Bull. 2009; 30(2):145-52.

4. Touger-Decker R, van Loveren C. Sugars and dental caries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 78(4):881S-92S.

5. Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ, Blum IR, Wilson NH. Minimally invasive management of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in US and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011; 142(6):612-20.

6. Sheikh C, Erickson P. Evaluation of plaque pH changes following oral rinse with eight infant formulas. Pediatr Dent. 1996; 18:200-4.

 7. Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community-implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 2006; 6(Suppl 1):S14.

8. Burne R. Oral streptococci… products of their environment. J Dent Res. 1998; 77(3):445-52.

9. Schachtele CF, Jensen ME. Comparison of methods for monitoring changes in the pH of human dental plaque. J Dent Res. 1982; 61(10):1117-25.

10. Moynihan PJ. Dietary advice in dental practice. Br Dent J. 2002; 193(10):563-8.

 11. Minton KL, Berry CW. Cariogenic potential of presweetened breakfast cereals. Pediatr Dent. 1985; 7(4):282-6.

12. Mundorff SA, Featherstone JD, Bibby BG, Curzon ME, Eisenberg AD, Espeland MA. Cariogenic potential of foods. I. Caries in the rat model. Caries Res. 1990; 24(5):344-55.

13. Bibby BG, Mundorff SA, Huang CT. Enamel demineralization tests with some standard foods and candies. J Dent Res. 1983; 62(8):885-8.

 14. Pantoja-Mendoza IY, Meléndez G, GuevaraCruz M, Serralde-Zúñiga AE. Review of complementary feeding practices in Mexican children. Nutr Hosp. 2015; 31(2):552-8.

 15. Mortazavi M, Pourhashemi SJ, Khosravi MB, Ashtari S, Ghaderi F. Assessment of a low dose of IV midazolam used orally for conscious sedation in pediatric dentistry. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2009; 17(2):79-82.

 16. Harper D, Abelson D, Jensen M. Human plaque acidity models. J Dent Res. 1986; 65:1503-10. 17. Curzon ME, Pollard MA. Integration of methods for determining the acido/cariogenic potential of foods: a comparison of several different methods. Caries Res. 1996; 30(2):126-31. 18. Pollard M, Imfeld T, Higham SM, Agalamanyi EA, Curzon ME, Edgar WM, et al. Acidogenic potential and total salivary carbohydrate content of expectorants following the consumption of some cereal-based foods and fruits. Caries Res. 1996; 30(2):132-7.

19. Lee EJ, Hwang IK, Paik DI, Jin BH. The cariogenicity of hydrolyzed starch foods by measuring the polyacrylamide hydroxyapatite (PAHA) disc. Arch Oral Biol. 2015; 60(11):1632-8.

 20. Mobley CC. Nutrition and dental caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2003; 47(2):319-36.

21. Hughes JA, West NX, Parker DM, van den Braak MH, Addy M. Effects of pH and concentration of citric, malic and lactic acids on enamel, in vitro. J Dent. 2000; 28(2):147-52.

22. Rose R. Effects of an anticariogenic casein phosphopeptide on calcium diffusion in streptococcal model dental plaques. Arch Oral Biol. 2000; 45(7):569-75.

23. Danchaivijitr A, Nakornchai S, Thaweeboon B, Leelataweewud P, Phonghanyudh A, Kiatprajak C, et al. The effect of different milk formulas on dental plaque pH. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006; 16(3):192-8.

 24. Nozari A, Ghaderi F, Madadelahi S. pH-value decrement of saliva-plaque solution after mixing with four customary used infant milk formulas: an in vitro study. J Pediatr Dent. 2014; 2(3):92.

25. Manohar V, Echard B, Perricone N, Ingram C, Enig M, Bagchi D, et al. In vitro and in vivo effects of two coconut oils in comparison to monolaurin on Staphylococcus aureus: rodent studies. J Med Food. 2013; 16(6):499-503.

26. Voragen AG. Technological aspects of functional food-related carbohydrates. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1998; 9(8):328-35.