Is There a Relationship Between Fidgety Movements and a History of Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Preterm Infants?

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Breastfeeding Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

10.22038/ijn.2025.76270.2472

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants with a history of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) are more susceptible to neurodevelopmental disorders, even in the absence of brain damage. Several diagnostic tools exist for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Assessment of general movements (GMs) is one method that predicts adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in at-risk infants. In this study, we assessed fidgety movements (FMs), a subtype of GMs, in preterm infants with and without a history of IUGR. Our objective was to determine if there was a correlation between absent or abnormal FMs and a history of IUGR in preterm infants. We also examined this correlation using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ).
Methods: A case-control study was conducted on preterm infants. The presence or absence of IUGR was confirmed by antenatal Color Doppler examination. Infants were referred to the Neurodevelopment Clinic at a corrected age of 3-5 months. Demographic, clinical, and maternal information was recorded. All infants' FMs were recorded, observed, and interpreted by a trained pediatrician. The ASQ was completed by parents.
Results: Thirty preterm infants were included. The mean gestational age at birth was 33 weeks, and the mean corrected gestational age at the time of the study was 14 weeks. No significant relationship was found between absent/abnormal FMs and a history of IUGR (P = 0.634). Significant associations were observed between absent/abnormal FMs and prolonged NICU admission (p = 0.004), surfactant requirement (p = 0.045), and maternal gestational diabetes mellitus (p = 0.046). There were also significant relationships between FMs and the ASQ in the communication (P = 0.014), gross motor (P = 0.0001), fine motor (P = 0.037), social (P = 0.037), and problem-solving (P = 0.001) domains.
Conclusion: The present study showed that there was no relationship between absent or abnormal FMs and IUGR in preterm infants.
 

Keywords

References

  1. Einspieler C, Bos AF, Libertus ME, Marschik PB. The general movement assessment helps us to identify preterm infants at risk for cognitive dysfunction. Front Psychol. 2016;7:406.
  2. Brar HS, Rutherford SE. Classification of intrauterine growth retardation. Semin Perinatol. 1988;12(1):2-10.
  3. Figueras F, Cruz‐Martinez R, Sanz‐Cortes M, Arranz A, Illa M, Botet F, et al. Neurobehavioral outcomes in preterm, growth‐restricted infants with and without prenatal advanced signs of brain‐sparing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(3):288-294.
  4. Jain J, Metgud D. Effect of individualized home-based intervention program in preterm infants at 35-36 weeks gestational age using prechtl’s general movement assessment: a pre-post experimental study. Int J Physiother Res. 2021;9(1):3730-3735.
  5. Salavati S, den Heijer AE, Coenen MA, Bruggink JL, Einspieler C, Bos AF, et al. The early motor repertoire in preterm infancy and cognition in young adulthood: Preliminary findings. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023;29(1):80-91.
  6. Shariat M, Gharaee J, Dalili H, Mohammadzadeh Y, Ansari S, Farahani Z. Association between small for gestational age and low birth weight with attention deficit and impaired executive functions in 3-6 years old children. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(9):1474-1477.
  7. Dalili H, Zaker Z, Keihanidoust Z, Farahani Z, Shariat M. Comparison of neuro-developmental status in preterm neonates with and without family based interventions. World J Adv Res Rev 2020;8(2):056-63.
  8. Prechtl HF, Einspieler C, Cioni G, Bos AF, Ferrari F, Sontheimer D. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. The Lancet. 1997;349(9062):1361-1363.
  9. Tanis J, Schmitz D, Boelen M, Casarella L, van den Berg P, Bilardo C, et al. Relationship between general movements in neonates who were growth restricted in utero and prenatal Doppler flow patterns. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48(6):772-778.
  10. Zuk L, Harel S, Leitner Y, Fattal-Valevski A. Neonatal general movements: an early predictor for neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with intrauterine growth retardation. J Child Neurol. 2004;19(1):14-18.
  11. Tomantschger I, Herrero D, Einspieler C, Hamamura C, Voos MC, Marschik PB. The general movement assessment in non-European low- and middle-income countries. Rev Saude Publica. 2018;52:6.
  12. Soleimani F, Badv RS, Momayezi A, Biglarian A, Marzban A. General movements as a predictive tool of the neurological outcome in term born infants with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91(8):479-82.
  13. Bos AF, Einspieler C, Prechtl HF. Intrauterine growth retardation, general movements, and neurodevelopmental outcome: a review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43(1):61-68.
  14. Adde L, Thomas N, John HB, Oommen S, Vågen RT, Fjørtoft T, et al. Early motor repertoire in very low birth weight infants in India is associated with motor development at one year. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20(6):918-924.
  15. Hutchon B, Gibbs D, Harniess P, Jary S, Crossley SL, Moffat JV, et al. Early intervention programmes for infants at high risk of atypical neurodevelopmental outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(12):1362-1367.
  16. Lea CL, Smith-Collins A, Luyt K. Protecting the premature brain: current evidence-based strategies for minimising perinatal brain injury in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102(2):F176-F182.
  17. Sharbaf FR, Movahed F, Pirjani R, Teimoory N, Shariat M, Farahani Z. Comparison of fetal middle cerebral artery versus umbilical artery color Doppler ultrasound for predicting neonatal outcome in complicated pregnancies with fetal growth restriction. Biomed Res Ther. 2018;5(5):2296-2304.
  18. Torabi F, Akbari SA, Amiri S, Soleimani F, Majd HA. Correlation between high-risk pregnancy and developmental delay in children aged 4-60 months. Libyan J Med. 2012;7(1).
  19. Woodward BJ, Papile LA, Lowe JR, Laadt VL, Shaffer ML, Montman R, et al. Use of the ages and stages questionnaire and Bayley Scales of Infant Development in neurodevelopmental follow-up of extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2011;31(10):641-646.
  20. Gollenberg AL, Lynch CD, Jackson LW, McGuinness BM, Msall ME. Concurrent validity of the parent-completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, 2nd Ed. with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II in a low-risk sample. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36(4):485-490.
  21. Einspieler C, Prechtl HF. Prechtl's assessment of general movements: a diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(1):61-67.
  22. Guzzetta A, Mercuri E, Rapisardi G, Ferrari F, Roversi M, Cowan F, et al. General movements detect early signs of hemiplegia in term infants with neonatal cerebral infarction. Neuropediatrics. 2003;34(02):61-66.
  23. Beccaria E, Martino M, Briatore E, Podestà B, Pomero G, Micciolo R, et al. Poor repertoire General Movements predict some aspects of development outcome at 2 years in very preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(6):393-396.
  24. Einspieler C, Marschik PB, Bos AF, Ferrari F, Cioni G, Prechtl HF. Early markers for cerebral palsy: insights from the assessment of general movements. Future Neurol. 2012;7(6):709-717.
  25. Bruggink JL, Cioni G, Einspieler C, Maathuis CG, Pascale R, Bos AF. Early motor repertoire is related to level of self-mobility in children with cerebral palsy at school age. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51(11):878-885.
  26. Yang H, Einspieler C, Shi W, Marschik PB, Wang Y, Cao Y, et al. Cerebral palsy in children: movements and postures during early infancy, dependent on preterm vs. full term birth. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88(10):837-843.
  27. Sacchi C, O'Muircheartaigh J, Batalle D, Counsell SJ, Simonelli A, Cesano M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following intrauterine growth restriction and very preterm birth. J Pediatr. 2021;238:135-144.
  28. Ma L, Yang B, Meng L, Wang B, Zheng C, Cao A. Effect of early intervention on premature infants’ general movements. Brain Dev. 2015;37(4):387-393.
  29. Porro M, Fontana C, Giannì ML, Pesenti N, Boggini T, De Carli A, et al. Early detection of general movements trajectories in very low birth weight infants. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-7.
  30. Zöllkau J, Swiderski L, Schmidt A, Weschenfelder F, Groten T, Hoyer D, et al. The relationship between gestational diabetes metabolic control and fetal autonomic regulation, movement and birth weight. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3378.
  31. Lokmanoğlu BNY, Topal Y, Porsnok D, Mutlu A. Early spontaneous movements in term infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes. Anatomy: International Journal of Experimental & Clinical Anatomy. 2022;16.
  32. Olsen JE, Cheong JL, Eeles AL, FitzGerald TL, Cameron KL, Albesher RA, et al. Early general movements are associated with developmental outcomes at 4.5–5 years. Early Hum Dev. 2020;148:105115.
Iranian Journal of Neonatology
Volume 16, Issue 3
July 2025
Pages 55-62

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics