A Narrative Review of Ultrasonographic Features of Umbilical Lesions in Children and Our Experience

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Department of Radiology, Dr.Sheikh Children Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

3 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: The umbilicus is the fibrous remnant of the fetal attachment of the umbilical cord. Ultrasonography is the preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of umbilical lesions. We present our experience and a review of ultrasound findings of umbilical lesions in children that may differentiate these lesions.
Methods: A query was conducted on online databases to identify and review articles in English studying umbilical lesions and their ultrasound features in children until September 2022. In some cases, the authors' unpublished experiences were also used due to insufficient ultrasound information in the literature.
Results: The thickness of the normal urachus is 2.5- 4 mm in newborns, and after the infancy period, it reduces to less than 2 mm. An increase in its thickness, generally or focally, indicates a patent urachus or urachal sinus. The normal cord or its remnant is observed as a hypoechoic mass surrounded by an elevated skin ring during infancy. The abdominal extension of the cord remnant suggests a patent urachal or omphalomesenteric remnant. On ultrasound, umbilical polyps are deep-seated lesions with mixed or hyper-echoic echo texture that can help differentiate them from umbilical cord remnants or umbilical granulomas. Ultrasonographic findings of omphalitis or the infected cord remnant are enlarged umbilicus as a large mass-like lesion associated with edema of peri-umbilical skin and subcutaneous tissues.
Conclusion: As evidenced by the results of this study, ultrasound can be used as a valuable complementary assessment tool for clinicians, allowing for assessing umbilical lesions and choosing the correct approach to treating these lesions.
 
Keywords: Omphalomesenteric duct, Ultrasound, Umbilical lesion, Umbilicus, Urachus
Background: The umbilicus is the fibrous remnant of the fetal attachment of the umbilical cord. Ultrasonography is the preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of umbilical lesions. We present our experience and a review of ultrasound findings of umbilical lesions in children that may differentiate these lesions.
Methods: A query was conducted on online databases to identify and review articles in English studying umbilical lesions and their ultrasound features in children until September 2022. In some cases, the authors' unpublished experiences were also used due to insufficient ultrasound information in the literature.
Results: The thickness of the normal urachus is 2.5- 4 mm in newborns, and after the infancy period, it reduces to less than 2 mm. An increase in its thickness, generally or focally, indicates a patent urachus or urachal sinus. The normal cord or its remnant is observed as a hypoechoic mass surrounded by an elevated skin ring during infancy. The abdominal extension of the cord remnant suggests a patent urachal or omphalomesenteric remnant. On ultrasound, umbilical polyps are deep-seated lesions with mixed or hyper-echoic echo texture that can help differentiate them from umbilical cord remnants or umbilical granulomas. Ultrasonographic findings of omphalitis or the infected cord remnant are enlarged umbilicus as a large mass-like lesion associated with edema of peri-umbilical skin and subcutaneous tissues.
Conclusion: As evidenced by the results of this study, ultrasound can be used as a valuable complementary assessment tool for clinicians, allowing for assessing umbilical lesions and choosing the correct approach to treating these lesions.
 
 

Keywords

References

  1. Fahmy M. Anatomy and physiology of the umbilicus. Umbilicus and Umbilical Cord: Springer; 2018.
  2. Das A. Umbilical lesions: a cluster of known unknowns and unknown unknowns. Cureus. 2019; 11(8):e5309.
  3. Khati NJ, Enquist EG, Javitt MC. Imaging of the umbilicus and periumbilical region. Radiographics. 1998; 18(2):413-31.
  4. Campbell J, Beasley SW, McMullin N, Hutson JM. Clinical diagnosis of umbilical swellings and discharges in children. Med J Aust. 1986; 145(9):450-3.
  5. Pomeranz A. Anomalies, abnormalities, and care of the umbilicus. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2004; 51(3):819-27.
  6. Boothroyd A, Cudmore R. Ultrasound of the discharging umbilicus. Pediatr radiol. 1996; 26(5):362-4.
  7. Hegazy AA. Anatomy and embryology of umbilicus in newborns: a review and clinical correlations. Front Med. 2016; 10(3):271-7.
  8. Muniraman H, Sardesai T, Sardesai S. Disorders of the umbilical cord. Pediatr Rev. 2018; 39(7):332-41.
  9. Olthof DC, Reemst S, Sleeboom C, Kuijper C, van Schuppen J, Derikx J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound to detect pathology that needs surgical exploration in children with umbilical discharge. J Pediatr Surg. 2021; 56(8):1436-40.
  10. Poenaru D. Disorders of the umbilicus in infants and children: A consensus statement of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons. Paediatr Child Health. 2001; 6(6):312-3.
  11. 11. Bansal AG, Rosenberg HK. Sonography of pediatric superficial lumps and bumps: illustrative examples from head to toe. Pediatr Radiol. 2017; 47(9):1171-83.
  12. Snyder CL. Current management of umbilical abnormalities and related anomalies. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery; 2007.
  13. Gaopande VL, Deshmukh SD, Khandeparkar SG, Suryavanshi MA, Patil VR. Clinical and histopathological profile of lesions of umbilicus. Med J Dr DY Patil Univ. 2015; 8(2):179.
  14. Kim DH, Lee HJ, Kim JY, Jung HR. Differential diagnosis of umbilical polyps and granulomas in children: sonographic and pathologic correlations. Ultrasonography. 2021; 40(2):248.
  15. Stock N, Azzis O, Jouan H. Umbilical polyp in an infant. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2008; 11(2):165-6.
  16. Orbatu D, Alaygut D. Evaluation and management of urachal remnants in children. Pediatr Int. 2020; 62(10):1158-61.
  17. Yu JS, Kim KW, Lee HJ, Lee YJ, Yoon CS, Kim MJ. Urachal remnant diseases: spectrum of CT and US findings. Radiographics. 2001; 21(2):451-61.
  18. Parada Villavicencio C, Adam SZ, Nikolaidis P, Yaghmai V, Miller FH. Imaging of the urachus: anomalies, complications, and mimics. Radiographics. 2016; 36(7):2049-63.
  19. Buddha S, Menias CO, Katabathina VS. Imaging of urachal anomalies. Abdom Radiol. 2019; 44(12):3978-89.
  20. Luo X, Lin J, Du L, Wu R, Li Z. Ultrasound findings of urachal anomalies. A series of interesting cases. Med Ultrason. 2019; 21(3):294-8.
  21. Wan YL, Lee TY, Tsai CC, Chen SMS, Chou FF. The role of sonography in the diagnosis and management of urachal abscesses. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991; 19(4):203-8.
  22. Ueno T, Hashimoto H, Yokoyama H, Ito M, Kouda K, Kanamaru H. Urachal anomalies: ultrasonography and management. J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38(8):1203-7.
  23. Bagade S, Khanna G. Imaging of omphalomesenteric duct remnants and related pathologies in children. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015; 44(3):246-55.
  24. Bahrami-Motlagh H, Sadeghi M, Amerifar M, Sabeti S, Rezaee SP, Peyvandi H. Concurrent omphalomesenteric duct cyst and ileal diverticulum causing small bowel obstruction; a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022; 94:107004.
  25. Taranath A, Lam A. Ultrasonographic demonstration of a type 1 omphalomesenteric duct remnant. Acta Radiol. 2006; 47(1):100-2.
  26. Sun C, Hu X, Huang L. Intestinal obstruction due to congenital bands from vitelline remnants: sonographic features and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31(12):2035-8.
  27. DiSantis D, Siegel M, Katz M. Simplified approach to umbilical remnant abnormalities. Radiographics. 1991; 11(1):59-66.
  28. Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Harvin HJ, Francis IR. Imaging manifestations of Meckel's diverticulum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189(1):81-8.
  29. Dames EL, Hamouda ES. Radiologic imaging in meckel diverticulum complications. J Med Ultrasound. 2015; 23(3):133-41.
  30. Alamdaran SA, Taherinezhad M, Feyzi A. Ileum terminal and mesenteric vessels; two fundamental gateways of ultrasound examination in acute abdomen of children. Int J Pediatr. 2021; 9(8):14183-95.
  31. Kotha V, Khandelwal A, Saboo S, Shanbhogue A, Virmani V, Marginean E, et al. Radiologist's perspective for the Meckel's diverticulum and its complications. Br J Radiol. 2014; 87(1036):20130743.
  32. El-Maadawy SM, Alaaeldin N, Zefov VN. Value of sonographic pseudogestational sac sign in the diagnosis of Meckel diverticulum in children presenting with bleeding per rectum: a 15-year prospective study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021; 52(1):1-12.
  33. Migoto MT, de Souza SNDH, Rossetto EG. Skin lesions of newborns in a neonatal unit: descriptive study. Online Braz J Nurs. 2013; 12(2):377-92.
  34. Sezer A, Toprak D. Skin lesion on umbilical region. Euras J Fam Med. 2013; 2(2):95-9.
  35. Lee K, Jo H, Jeon E, Jung K, Moon J, Park S. Omphalitis in neonates and infants: imaging findings and assessment of underlying causes using sonography. Radiological Society of North America; 2012.
  36. Steiner A, Lejeune B. Ultrasonographic assessment of umbilical disorders. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009; 25(3):781-94.
  37. Franklin RP, Ferrell EA. How to perform umbilical sonograms in the neonate. InProc Am Assoc Equine Pract; 2002.
Iranian Journal of Neonatology
Volume 14, Issue 2
April 2023
Pages 20-29

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics