Fetal and Neonatal Impact of a Short Interpregnancy Interval in Moroccan Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Research Team on Health and Nutrition of Mother and Child, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques, Rabat, Morocco

2 Research Team on Health and Nutrition of Mother and Child, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco

Abstract

Background: The short interpregnancy interval is a frequent clinical situation with adverse fetal, neonatal, and infantile outcomes. The present study aimed to assess the fetal and neonatal consequences of closely spaced pregnancies.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 162 mothers, 81 of whom had an inter-pregnancy interval of fewer than 18 months, and 81 cases had an inter-pregnancy interval of more than 18 months. These participants had given birth at the Souissi Maternity Hospital in Rabat during the last 12 months. The socio-economic data, obstetrical history, as well as fetal and neonatal data, were extracted from medical records via a pre-established questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed in SPSS software (version 20.0).
Results: The mean scores of the inter-pregnancy interval were reported as 11.83±3.08 and 29.83±9.83 in the groups of closely spaced pregnancies and inter-pregnancy intervals of more than 18 months (P=0.03). The number of illiterate women was significantly higher in the group with a short interpregnancy interval, compared to that in the group with an interpregnancy interval over 18 months (46.9% versus 9.9; P<0.001). Almost one-third of women with a short interpregnancy interval had a premature birth. Other adverse fetal outcomes, including low birth weight and respiratory distress, were detected with prevalence rates of 21% (p<0.001) and 9.9%, respectively (P=0.04).
Conclusion: As evidenced by the results of this study, it is essential to inform families and mothers about the fact that a reasonable delay (> 18 months)  between pregnancies reduces the risks for both mother and child.
 
 

Keywords

References

  1. Vandenbroucke L, Lavoué V, Voltzenlogel M-C, Le Guellec M, Lassel L, Isly H, et al. Risk factors and perinatal consequences of short interpregnancy interval: a retrospective case-control study. J Gynaecology Obstetrics Biol Reprod. 2012;
    42(2):166-73.
  2. Thapaliya R, Rai BK, Bhandari R, Rijal P, Gupta PP. The effect of birth interval on fetal outcomes. Health Renais. 2015;13(3):169–76.
  3. Mahande MJ, Obure J. Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;
    16(1):140.
  4. Jansa V, Blickstein I, Lucovnik M, Fabjan-Vodusek V, Verdenik I, Tul N. The impact of inter-pregnancy interval on subsequent risk of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(5):621-624.
  5. Ekin A, Gezer C, Taner CE, Ozeren M, Mat E, Solmaz U. Impact of interpregnancy interval on the subsequent risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015; 41(11):1744–51.
  6. Appareddy S, Pryor J, Bailey B. Inter-pregnancy interval and adverse outcomes: Evidence for an additional risk in h ealth disparate populations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:2640–4.
  7. Dadi A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of short birth interval on infant mortality in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126759.
  8. Shahjada A, Sharma BK, Sharma S, Mahashabde P and Bachhotiya A. Effects of birth interval on nutritional status of under five children in periurban area of Madhya Pradesh, India. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3:723-726.
  9. Conde-Agudelo A., Rosas-Bermudez A., Castaño Fabio and Norton Maureen H. Effects of Birth Spacing on Maternal, Perinatal, Infant, and Child Health: A Systematic Review of Causal Mechanisms. Stud Fam Plan. 2012;43:93–114.
  10. WHO (2005). Report of a WHO Technical Consultation on Birth Spacing Geneva, Switzerland. June 13–15, 2005. WHO, Department of Making Pregnancy Safer and Department of Reproductive Health and Research. http://apps.who.int/iris/
    bitstream/handle/10665/69855/WHO_RHR_07.1_eng.pdf?sequence=1     Consulted on December 20, 2021
  11. Ball SJ, Pereira G, Jacoby P, de Klerk N, Stanley Re-evaluation of link between inter-pregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother. BMJ. 2014;349:g4333.
  12. Ishag A, Moslim H I, Abubakr MN, Martin HP, LUC J. M. Low birth weight, preterm birth and close pregnancy interval in Sudan. J Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(11):1068–1071.
  13. Zilberman B. Influence of a short interpregnancy interval on pregnancy outcome. Harefuah. 2007;
    146(1):42-7.
  14. Cecatti JG, Correa-Silva EP, Milanez H, Morais SS, Souza JP. The associations between interpregnancy interval and maternal and neonatal outcomes in Brazil. Matern Child Health J. 2008;12:275-81.
  15. Dedecker F, Graesslin O, Ceccaldi PF, Baudelot E, Montilla F,Derniaux E, et al. Close pregnancies: risk factors and perinatal consequences. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2006; 35:28-34.
  16. Smith G, Pel J, Dobbie R. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study. BMJ .2003;327:313.
  17. Marcellina L. Prévention de l’accouchement prématuré par cerclage du col de l’utérus. Journal
    de gynécologie Obstétrique et Bioligie de la reproduction. 2016;45:1299-1323.
  18. Zhu B-P, Rolf R, Nangle B, Horan J. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(8):589-94.
  19. Smith G, Pel J, Dobbie R. Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327:313.
Iranian Journal of Neonatology
Volume 13, Issue 2
April 2022
Pages 54-59

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics