A Comparative Study between Postextubation of Preterm Neonates into High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Armed Forces College Of Medicine, Egypt

2 Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

Abstract

Background: For respiratory support in premature newborns, there has been a trend toward less tracheal
intubation, less mechanical ventilation, and more nasal respiratory support which can result in the improvement of
successful extubation rate. The two commonly known types of nasal respiratory support after extubation are the
nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC). The current study aimed to
investigate and compare successful extubation using HFNC and conventional nasal CPAP after a period of
endotracheal positive pressure ventilation and detect which of these two methods is better for successful
extubation with fewer side effects.
Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted on 210 preterm newborns in the neonatal intensive care
unit (NICU) of Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Qasr El Eyni Hospital. Post extubation failure rates were
compared between the two groups, namely (HFNC) and (nasal CPAP). The collected data were analyzed in SPSS
software (version 20).
Results: Neonates who needed re-intubation within 72 h after initial extubation were higher in the HFNC group
(72.7%) versus (27.3%) in the CPAP group (P-value=0.063). Moreover, 45.8% of neonates in the HFNC group needed
re-intubation within 1 week of initial extubation versus 54.2% in CPAP (P-value=0.970). The mean duration of
respiratory support using HFNC was 3.7 days, compared to 6.5 days using CPAP (P-value= 0.001). Among neonates
who suffered from nasal trauma, 90.6% of neonates belonged to the CPAP group, while 9.4% of cases belonged to the
HFNC group (P-value= 0.001).
Conclusion: The use of CPAP and HFNC after the extubation of preterm mechanically ventilated neonates was
statistically equal regarding extubation failure.
 

Keywords

References

  1. Warren JB, Anderson JM. Newborn respiratory disorders. Pediatr Rev. 2010; 31(12):487-95.
  2. Pillai MS, Sankar MJ, Mani K, Agarwal R, Paul VK, Deorari AK. Clinical prediction score for nasal CPAP failure in pre-term VLBW neonates with early
    onset respiratory distress. J Trop Pediatr. 2011; 57(4):274-9.
  3. Ojha S, Gridley E, Dorling J. Use of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula oxygen in neonates: a UK wide survey. Acta Paediatr. 2013; 102(3):249-53.
  4. Collins CL, Barfield C, Horne RS, Davis PG. A comparison of nasal trauma in preterm infants extubated to either heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae or nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Eur J Pediatr. 2014; 173(2):181-6.
  5. Bohrer B, Silveira RC, Neto EC, Procianoy RS. Mechanical ventilation of newborns infant changes in plasma pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines. J Pediatr. 2010; 156(1):16-9.
  6. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, Frøisland DH, Donath SM, Dalziel KM, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(12):1142-51.
  7. Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, King J, Dirnberger DR, Abbasi S. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(5):e1482-90.
  8. Badiee Z, Eshghi A, Mohammadizadeh M. High flow nasal cannula as a method for rapid weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Int J Prev Med. 2015; 6:33.
  9. Elkhwad M, Dako J, Jennifer G, Harriet F, Anand K. Randomized control trial: heated humidity high flow nasal cannula in comparison with NASAL CPAP in the management of RDS in extreme low birth infants in immediate post extubation period. J Neonat Pediatr Med. 2017; 3(1):121.
  10. 10. Taha DK, Kornhauser M, Greenspan JS, Dysart KC, Aghai ZH. High flow nasal cannula use is associated with increased morbidity and length of hospitalization in extremely low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2016; 173:50-5.
  11. 11. de Jongh BE, Locke R, Mackley A, Emberger J, Bostick D, Stefano J, et al. Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol. 2014; 34(1):27-32.
  12. 12. Hoffman SB, Terrell N, Driscoll CH, Davis NL. Impact of high-flow nasal cannula use on neonatal respiratory support patterns and length of stay. Respir Care. 2016; 61(10):1299-304.
  13. 13. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O'Donnell CP, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2:CD006405.
  14. 14. Miller SM, Dowd SA. High-flow nasal cannula and extubation success in the premature infant: a comparison of two modalities. J Perinatol. 2010; 30(12):805-8.
  15. 15. Costa AC, Schettino RD, Ferreira SC. Predictors of extubation failure and reintubation in newborn infants subjected to mechanical ventilation. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014; 26(1):51-6.

Iranian Journal of Neonatology
Volume 12, Issue 1
January 2021
Pages 12-19

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics