Hydronephrosis Index as a New Method for the Evaluation and Follow-up of Fetal Hydronephrosis

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Radiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Abstract

Background: The present study was conducted to compare the efficiency of hydronephrosis index (HI) with those of pelvic anteroposterior (AP) diameter and parenchymal thickness in the diagnosis of fetal hydronephrosis in the prenatal period, as well as 1, 6, and 12 months after birth. Methods: This study was conducted on pregnant women with the pregnancy age of > 30 weeks whose fetus was suspected of hydronephrosis. The study participants were collected via the consecutive sampling method. The HI, pelvic AP diameter, and parenchymal thickness were measured at the baseline and 1, 6, and 12 months after delivery using ultrasound. According to the study design, the study participants were divided into three groups. Group A consisted of cases with decreased HI and higher hydronephrosis severity. Group B was composed of subjects with relatively constant HI, and group C entailed individuals with increased HI and lower hydronephrosis severity. All of the study measurements and analyses were performed on the three study groups. Results: The results revealed a negative association between HI and pelvic AP diameter but a positive association with parenchymal thickness. On the other hand, HI showed a significant correlation with parenchymal thickness in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of fetal hydronephrosis. Conclusion: The HI correlated with parenchymal thickness and pelvic AP diameter scores in all follow-up stages. Accordingly, HI can be concluded to be a good alternative to parenchymal thickness or pelvic AP diameter as a grading factor for hydronephrosis. It is suggested to perform further studies to carefully assess the efficiency of HI in the diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical outcome of hydronephrosis.

Keywords


1. Belarmino JM, Kogan BA. Management of neonatal hydronephrosis. Early Hum Dev. 2006; 82(1):9-14. 2. Shapiro SR, Wahl EF, Silberstein MJ, Steinhardt G. Hydronephrosis index: a new method to track patients with hydronephrosis quantitatively. Urology. 2008; 72(3):536-8.
3. Sidhu G, Beyene J, Rosenblum ND. Outcome of isolated antenatal hydronephrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006; 21(2):218-24.
4. Zanetta VC, Rosman BM, Bromley B, Shipp TD, Chow JS, Campbell JB, et al. Variations in management of mild prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, and pediatric urologists and radiologists. J Urol. 2012; 188(5):1935-9.
5. Hodhod A, Capolicchio JP, Jednak R, El-Sherif E, ElDoray Ael A, El-Sherbiny M. Evaluation of urinary tract dilation classification system for grading postnatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 2016; 195(3): 725-30.
6. Venkatesan K, Green J, Shapiro SR, Steinhardt GF. Correlation of hydronephrosis index to society of fetal urology hydronephrosis scale. Adv Urol. 2009; 2009:960490.
7. Leung VY, Chu WC, Metreweli C. Hydronephrosis index: a better physiological reference in antenatal ultrasound for assessment of fetal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr. 2009; 154(1):116-20.
8. Hong YK, Lee JH, Hong YK, Lee JH. Evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Child Kidney Dis. 2015; 19(1):8-13.
9. Grisoni ER, Gauderer MW, Wolfson RN, Izant RJ Jr. Antenatal ultrasonography: the experience in a high risk perinatal center. J Pediatr Surg. 1986; 21(4):358-61.
10. Zerin JM, Ritchey ML, Chang AC. Incidental vesicoureteral reflux in neonates with antenatally detected hydronephrosis and other renal abnormalities. Radiology. 1993; 187(1):157-60.
11. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol. 1993; 23(6):478-80.
12. Koff SA, Campbell K. Nonoperative management of unilateral neonatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 1992; 148(2 Pt 2):525-31.
13. Shapiro SR, Wahl EF, Silberstein MJ, Steinhardt G. Hydronephrosis index: a new method to track patients with hydronephrosis quantitatively. Urology. 2008; 72(3):536-8.
14. Cerrolaza JJ, Grisan E, Safdar N, Myers E, Jago J, Peters CA, et al. Quantification of kidneys from 3D ultrasound in pediatric hydronephrosis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015; 2015:157-60.
15. Wang J, Ying W, Tang D, Yang L, Liu D, Liu Y, et al. Prognostic value of three-dimensional ultrasound for fetal hydronephrosis. Exper Ther Med. 2015; 9(3):766-72.